Comments on: Would you pay for Twitter? http://www.rubberrepublic.com/2009/11/would-you-pay-for-twitter/ We make & share great content for entertainment brands & brands that want to be entertaining Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:36:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: Kirk http://www.rubberrepublic.com/2009/11/would-you-pay-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-2260 Kirk Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:50:17 +0000 http://www.rubberrepublic.com/blog/?p=747#comment-2260 Do people pay for www.yammer.com? Yep. 'nuff said. Do people pay for http://www.yammer.com? Yep. ’nuff said.

]]> By: Marc http://www.rubberrepublic.com/2009/11/would-you-pay-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-1221 Marc Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:02:03 +0000 http://www.rubberrepublic.com/blog/?p=747#comment-1221 I don't understand why twitter havnet offered a corporate service sooner. Not by charging for public-facing company accounts but as a platform for internal communications... I don’t understand why twitter havnet offered a corporate service sooner. Not by charging for public-facing company accounts but as a platform for internal communications…

]]> By: Andy http://www.rubberrepublic.com/2009/11/would-you-pay-for-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-1098 Andy Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:37:55 +0000 http://www.rubberrepublic.com/blog/?p=747#comment-1098 Nice post Darren, I liked Jeff Jarvis' piece, thanks. One of the 'epic stories' we're using as we develop Viral Ad Network is "Thinking big, staying small (human scalability)". We're adamant that big teams = bloat. The whole of Team Rubber is structured around that. Small teams = surgical, fast, responsive. Meanwhile software scales well and lets us think big: ambitious, global, inventive, powerful, without the cost. Our ultimate aim is to keep prices down for advertisers and earnings up for publishers = win. It's not an easy problem, but we enjoy hard problems :) Nice post Darren, I liked Jeff Jarvis’ piece, thanks. One of the ‘epic stories’ we’re using as we develop Viral Ad Network is “Thinking big, staying small (human scalability)”. We’re adamant that big teams = bloat. The whole of Team Rubber is structured around that. Small teams = surgical, fast, responsive. Meanwhile software scales well and lets us think big: ambitious, global, inventive, powerful, without the cost.

Our ultimate aim is to keep prices down for advertisers and earnings up for publishers = win. It’s not an easy problem, but we enjoy hard problems :)

]]>