<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peanut butter and chocolate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rubberrepublic.com/2009/11/peanut-butter-and-chocolate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rubberrepublic.com/2009/11/peanut-butter-and-chocolate/</link>
	<description>We make &#38; share great content for entertainment brands &#38; brands that want to be entertaining</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:36:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.rubberrepublic.com/2009/11/peanut-butter-and-chocolate/comment-page-1/#comment-3277</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rubberrepublic.com/blog/?p=630#comment-3277</guid>
		<description>Really interesting post. I&#039;m new to twitter and already thinking about how I must be perceived on there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting post. I&#8217;m new to twitter and already thinking about how I must be perceived on there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Visser</title>
		<link>http://www.rubberrepublic.com/2009/11/peanut-butter-and-chocolate/comment-page-1/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Visser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rubberrepublic.com/blog/?p=630#comment-870</guid>
		<description>So long as you can filter which tweets get pushed into LinkedIn (in the same manner that you can filter which tweets get pushed across to FB) I think it&#039;s a logical progression. Everything&#039;s going to be integrated soon, so we may as well embrace it when we see it.

Bot&#039;s and Spam are a by-product of a process that we all feed everyday through our continued contribution to the attention economy which lives through all of these channels. More marketing propositions on LinkedIn is a dangerous idea though (especially if the auto-follower-army get involved), the users on LinkedIn are the stock and any other promotional activity is going to detract away from the core premise of the site, diluting their online positioning.

Just my thoughts on it, which I wouldn&#039;t have had without reading this post, so thanks, enjoyed the reading and the thinking that you stimulated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So long as you can filter which tweets get pushed into LinkedIn (in the same manner that you can filter which tweets get pushed across to FB) I think it&#8217;s a logical progression. Everything&#8217;s going to be integrated soon, so we may as well embrace it when we see it.</p>
<p>Bot&#8217;s and Spam are a by-product of a process that we all feed everyday through our continued contribution to the attention economy which lives through all of these channels. More marketing propositions on LinkedIn is a dangerous idea though (especially if the auto-follower-army get involved), the users on LinkedIn are the stock and any other promotional activity is going to detract away from the core premise of the site, diluting their online positioning.</p>
<p>Just my thoughts on it, which I wouldn&#8217;t have had without reading this post, so thanks, enjoyed the reading and the thinking that you stimulated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSummerfield</title>
		<link>http://www.rubberrepublic.com/2009/11/peanut-butter-and-chocolate/comment-page-1/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>JSummerfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rubberrepublic.com/blog/?p=630#comment-869</guid>
		<description>I agree it&#039;s an unlikely combination and I&#039;m not sure that i want to combine my Twitter and LinkedIn &#039;personalities&#039; as i make a lot of throwaway comments on Twitter. It&#039;s good for LinkedIn as it could give people a reason to return on a more frequent basis but I think it risks diluting Twitter as people will become cautious and guarded about what they tweet if it also appears on their LinkedIn account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree it&#8217;s an unlikely combination and I&#8217;m not sure that i want to combine my Twitter and LinkedIn &#8216;personalities&#8217; as i make a lot of throwaway comments on Twitter. It&#8217;s good for LinkedIn as it could give people a reason to return on a more frequent basis but I think it risks diluting Twitter as people will become cautious and guarded about what they tweet if it also appears on their LinkedIn account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan G</title>
		<link>http://www.rubberrepublic.com/2009/11/peanut-butter-and-chocolate/comment-page-1/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rubberrepublic.com/blog/?p=630#comment-866</guid>
		<description>I agree that the relative frivolity of tweets is probably going to annoy most folks on LinkedIn... although LinkedIn updates going out as tweets probably makes sense.

I also wonder if Twitter Lists will somehow be combined with LinkedIn Group memberships.  That would facilitate the sort of campaigns you&#039;re talking about.

BUT... like all mass advertising, I believe there&#039;s a serious overload problem.  Already, I have had to reduce or eliminate updates from LinkedIn Groups due to (human) bots posting spam.  Advertising, regardless of if it&#039;s a direct LinkedIn post or a tweet, unless it&#039;s HIGHLY targeted to the Group, will certainly force me off even more groups.  That however gives an idea of how advertisers can be successful: by offering to moderate a Group... to remove spam and spammers... the advertiser not only gives something of value, but also ensures a higher likelihood that his own message gets seen.  One Group I belong to is run by a specific company: they advertise their wares, but they also spend a great deal of time ensuring the discussions stay on topic.

I am also annoyed by the constant drone of &quot;Connect with me even though I don&#039;t know you and won&#039;t ever render anything of value through our link&quot; messages.  This is the beauty of Twitter: anyone can follow me and I have no expectation of having to interact with them... ever.  Perhaps this is the root of your cognitive dissonance regarding putting Twitter and LinkedIn together: Twitter is inherently a push medium while LinkedIn is much more of a pull.  The bidirectionality of LinkedIn must be considered strongly when planning ad campaigns there, but the tweet medium makes that less likely.

Dan G
LinkedIn since 2003
&lt;&gt; titudeAdjust</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the relative frivolity of tweets is probably going to annoy most folks on LinkedIn&#8230; although LinkedIn updates going out as tweets probably makes sense.</p>
<p>I also wonder if Twitter Lists will somehow be combined with LinkedIn Group memberships.  That would facilitate the sort of campaigns you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>BUT&#8230; like all mass advertising, I believe there&#8217;s a serious overload problem.  Already, I have had to reduce or eliminate updates from LinkedIn Groups due to (human) bots posting spam.  Advertising, regardless of if it&#8217;s a direct LinkedIn post or a tweet, unless it&#8217;s HIGHLY targeted to the Group, will certainly force me off even more groups.  That however gives an idea of how advertisers can be successful: by offering to moderate a Group&#8230; to remove spam and spammers&#8230; the advertiser not only gives something of value, but also ensures a higher likelihood that his own message gets seen.  One Group I belong to is run by a specific company: they advertise their wares, but they also spend a great deal of time ensuring the discussions stay on topic.</p>
<p>I am also annoyed by the constant drone of &#8220;Connect with me even though I don&#8217;t know you and won&#8217;t ever render anything of value through our link&#8221; messages.  This is the beauty of Twitter: anyone can follow me and I have no expectation of having to interact with them&#8230; ever.  Perhaps this is the root of your cognitive dissonance regarding putting Twitter and LinkedIn together: Twitter is inherently a push medium while LinkedIn is much more of a pull.  The bidirectionality of LinkedIn must be considered strongly when planning ad campaigns there, but the tweet medium makes that less likely.</p>
<p>Dan G<br />
LinkedIn since 2003<br />
&lt;&gt; titudeAdjust</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cross (@crossy)</title>
		<link>http://www.rubberrepublic.com/2009/11/peanut-butter-and-chocolate/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cross (@crossy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rubberrepublic.com/blog/?p=630#comment-864</guid>
		<description>Nice blog post and an interesting topic - I think Twitter and LinkedIn would work well together so combining the services seems like an obvious step.  I use Twitter for personal and business reasons but I&#039;d have no problem in having my stream appear online at LinkedIn as well. 

It also gives LinkedIn a bit more personality, which can be lacking in a simple &quot;check out my CV&quot; format.

The only odd thing is having Reid Hoffman and Biz Stone on a video together - it doesn&#039;t work - it&#039;s like the PC vs Mac ad except they both have the obligatory rectangular web 2.0 glasses. Just my opinion anyway!

PS - Is that really Reid Hoffman or is it Mark Benton doing an accent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog post and an interesting topic &#8211; I think Twitter and LinkedIn would work well together so combining the services seems like an obvious step.  I use Twitter for personal and business reasons but I&#8217;d have no problem in having my stream appear online at LinkedIn as well. </p>
<p>It also gives LinkedIn a bit more personality, which can be lacking in a simple &#8220;check out my CV&#8221; format.</p>
<p>The only odd thing is having Reid Hoffman and Biz Stone on a video together &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t work &#8211; it&#8217;s like the PC vs Mac ad except they both have the obligatory rectangular web 2.0 glasses. Just my opinion anyway!</p>
<p>PS &#8211; Is that really Reid Hoffman or is it Mark Benton doing an accent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Rubber Republic - News -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.rubberrepublic.com/2009/11/peanut-butter-and-chocolate/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Rubber Republic - News -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rubberrepublic.com/blog/?p=630#comment-863</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rax Lakhani, Rubber Republic. Rubber Republic said: Tips on how Linkedin can now be used in social campaigns http://bit.ly/2Z0wyY [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rax Lakhani, Rubber Republic. Rubber Republic said: Tips on how Linkedin can now be used in social campaigns <a href="http://bit.ly/2Z0wyY" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2Z0wyY</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JessG</title>
		<link>http://www.rubberrepublic.com/2009/11/peanut-butter-and-chocolate/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>JessG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rubberrepublic.com/blog/?p=630#comment-861</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. Sounds like a good idea - to a point. Whilst I wouldn&#039;t mind combining some freelance things I do with both Twitter (because I have quite a few contacts that I communicate with through Twitter) and LinkedIn, I probably wouldn&#039;t  be so keen on doing that with my day job. 

Also, I would&#039;ve thought that peanut butter and am would&#039;ve been a more well known phrase...wonder why they chose chocolate over the usual?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. Sounds like a good idea &#8211; to a point. Whilst I wouldn&#8217;t mind combining some freelance things I do with both Twitter (because I have quite a few contacts that I communicate with through Twitter) and LinkedIn, I probably wouldn&#8217;t  be so keen on doing that with my day job. </p>
<p>Also, I would&#8217;ve thought that peanut butter and am would&#8217;ve been a more well known phrase&#8230;wonder why they chose chocolate over the usual?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

